UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I WEST O'AHU

STUDENT ACADEMIC GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE


        Approved by the UH-WO Faculty Senate, February 21, 1997
        Approved by Executive Vice-Chancellor Bruce Bergland, February 24, 1997


CONTENTS:

I. Introduction

II. Definitions

III. Responsibilities of Faculty Members

IV. Responsibilities of Students

V. Resolution of Complaints of Academic Impropriety

VI. Resolution of Academic Grievances




I. Introduction

In higher education, it is an established tradition that faculty members have the authority to conduct classes, provide for the discussion of ideas, make assignments, require examinations, papers and/or projects, and render judgements on the performances of students. The exercise of this authority provides the foundation for an academic relationship between faculty members and students. This relationship is maintained by the interplay of traditional and customary standards of conduct and courtesies, the observance of which is the responsibility of both faculty and students.

From time to time, issues associated with the faculty member's responsibilities as a teacher and the student's responsibilities as a learner may arise. This document has been adopted by the University of Hawai'i - West O'ahu to establish procedures for addressing these issues and to provide for the consistent and equitable resolution of legitimate student academic complaints.



II. Definitions

Academic Grievance - A written statement filed by a student, alleging academic impropriety and requesting a formal review by the Academic Grievance Committee.

Academic Grievance Committee (AGC) - A committee of faculty members and students appointed by the Chancellor to review and act on academic grievances.

Academic Impropriety - The failure of a faculty member to adhere to one or more of his/her academic responsibilities.

Division Chair - The individual designated as the administrative head of an academic division.

Faculty Member - An individual employed by the University to provide scheduled instruction for credit.

Frivolous Grievance - A complaint that is so weak and unsubstantial as to be void of merit or for which there is no identifiable or appropriate remedy.

Grievant - A student who has filed a formal complaint of academic impropriety.

Remedy - An action intended to correct a student's complaint of academic impropriety.

Report of Academic Impropriety - A written expression of inquiry by a student regarding a faculty member's alleged failure to meet one or more faculty responsibilities.

Semester - A scheduled term of instruction, normally consisting of Fall, Spring, or Summer.

Student - An individual officially enrolled in a credit course for credit.



III. Responsibilities of Faculty Members

Faculty members of the University of Hawai'i - West O'ahu are expected to conduct themselves at the highest level of professional standards. Faculty member responsibilities include the following:

A. To provide students with an academic environment that is conducive to learning where students are treated equitably and fairly, free from harassment or discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, sexual orientation, or veteran status.

B. To provide instruction as scheduled with class meetings beginning and ending at the published times and dates, and to administer final examinations as scheduled.

C. To allow students to question and discuss information, data or other materials which have been presented orally or in writing as part of the instructional program for the course.

D. To allow students to take reasoned exception to the views offered, and to form and express their own judgments and opinions.

E. To provide students with sufficient and timely information about the standards they are expected to meet, and the consequences of failure to meet those standards.

F. To inform students about the procedures that will be used to evaluate their achievements, and to adhere to those procedures. If changes in the evaluation procedures are deemed necessary by the faculty member, students should be informed of the changes in a timely manner.

G. To evaluate work submitted by students solely on an academic basis in a consistent, objective manner, and to provide students with the results of the evaluations in a timely fashion. Opinions expressed, and conduct in or out of class which are unrelated to the meeting of academic standards, shall not be considered in completing these evaluations.

H. To provide students with an opportunity to review their own examinations, papers, and other assignments after they have been evaluated.

I. To provide students with opportunities to discuss academic matters out of class by posting and maintaining weekly office hours during the semester at times which are mutually convenient to students and faculty.

J. To retain all work submitted by students (unless returned) for a minimum of six months following the end of the semester, including records used for the purpose of issuing grades.

K. To transmit information about grades and grade changes to the Student Services Office in a timely manner such that students' academic records are complete and up-to-date.

L. To refrain from inappropriately disclosing or discussing information about a student's views, beliefs, and/or political associations acquired in a course without the student's knowledge or consent.

M. To refrain from interfering with these academic grievance procedures, or from taking retaliatory action against a student because the student has filed a complaint or grievance.



IV. Responsibilities of Students

Students enrolled at the University of Hawai'i - West O'ahu are expected to adhere to the highest standards of academic behavior while on campus. The responsibilities of students include:

A. To behave in a manner which does not interfere with the right of other students to learn and the right of faculty members to teach.

B. To complete the prescribed prerequisites prior to enrolling into courses, recognizing that without the required preparation, learning may be impaired and the grade received for the course may be adversely affected.

C. To attend the classes in which they are enrolled and to participate cooperatively in academic activities as required by the faculty member, recognizing that failure to do so may adversely affect the grade received for the course.

D. To fulfill assignments, take examinations, and complete other requirements established by the faculty member by the stated deadlines, recognizing that failure to do so may adversely affect the grade received for the course.

E. To contact the faculty member and make arrangements for submitting missing work by the stated deadline in a course where a grade of "I" was granted, recognizing that failure to do so will result in the "I" becoming a letter grade assigned by the faculty member.

F. To withdraw from courses in which enrollment is no longer desired by the stated deadlines, recognizing that failure to do so may result in the assignment of a failing grade.

G. To abide by the Student Conduct Code and other academic policies and regulations of the University of Hawai'i - West O'ahu.

H. To refrain from filing frivolous grievances.

I. To recognize that in cases of alleged academic impropriety, the burden of proof rests upon the grievant.





V. Resolution of Complaints of Academic Impropriety

If a student has fulfilled the student responsibilities as described in Part IV of this document and believes that a faculty member has failed to meet the faculty member's responsibilities as stated in Part III, the student may take action to achieve remedy. The first step must be taken by the student within 10 working days after the alleged act of academic impropriety.



STEP 1 - INFORMAL RESOLUTION

A. The student shall make every reasonable effort (by phone, mail, personal appearance) to contact the faculty member, discuss the issue, and resolve the problem.

B. If the faculty member fails to respond to the student's attempts to contact him/her within the ten-day period, or if the discussion does not lead to the satisfactory resolution of the alleged academic impropriety, the student may proceed to Step 2.



STEP 2 - REPORT OF ACADEMIC IMPROPRIETY

Step 2 shall be taken by students who were unable to achieve resolution informally with the faculty member in Step 1.



A. The student shall report the alleged academic impropriety in writing to the faculty member's Division Chair within 20 working days of the alleged academic impropriety, or within 10 days of the final communication with the faculty member in Step 1, whichever occurs last.

The student's report of academic impropriety shall describe the facts as the student perceives them, citing specific acts and events, and indicate the remedy that is sought. If, however, the faculty member in question is also the Division Chair, or the Division Chair is unavailable, the student shall skip Step 2 and proceed to Part IV.



B. The Division Chair shall meet with the student and the faculty member separately, or jointly, if both agree. The Division Chair may also consult with others as necessary. Prior to making a recommendation, the Division Chair shall consult with the appropriate individuals to ascertain that the proposed remedy does not violate or conflict with existing University policies or practices.

Having completed the consultations and meetings, the Division Chair shall notify the student and faculty member in writing of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations. This notice shall be sent within 10 working days of receipt of the report of academic impropriety from the student. A copy of the notice shall also be sent to the Dean of Student Services.

The notice shall also inform the student that if the student desires to appeal this decision, an academic grievance must be filed with the Chair of the Academic Grievance Committee within five (5) working days of receipt of the notice, via the Office of the Chancellor.



C. In the event that the faculty member in question is unavailable for consultation (e.g., out of town), the Division Chair may elect to defer the review until the faculty member returns; however, this postponement may not exceed two semesters.



VI. Resolution of Academic Grievances

FILING OF ACADEMIC GRIEVANCES

An academic grievance is a written statement filed by a student, alleging that academic impropriety has been experienced and requesting that the student's allegation be reviewed by the Academic Grievance Committee. The student's academic grievance shall contain all the information previously provided to the Division Chair and any additional information relevant to the grievance.

A copy of the notification received from the Division Chair, and any other supporting documents should also be attached.



ACADEMIC GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

A. The Academic Grievance Committee (AGC) shall be appointed by the Chancellor. The committee shall consist of a Chair, two faculty members, and two students.

B. The Chair shall be appointed by the Chancellor and shall be a tenured faculty member. The Chair shall not be faculty member named in the academic grievance or the Division Chair.

The Chair shall preside at Academic Grievance committee meetings during an academic year. The Chair shall be a non-voting member of the committee, except in the case of a tie. The Chair shall be present at all meetings of the committee and shall be responsible for maintaining a record of all of the committee's proceedings, correspondence, and activities.

B. The faculty members appointed by the Chancellor to serve on the committee shall represent different academic divisions. One shall be from the division in which the involved faculty member is teaching, and one shall be from the division in which the student is pursuing his/her academic program, if different from the faculty member's division. With the exception of the Chair, the faculty committee members shall be appointed for specific grievances.

C. The student members of the committee shall be appointed by the Chancellor, in consultation with the Dean of Student Services.



At least one student shall be enrolled in the same academic division as the grievant.

D. Committees members who believe their relationship with the grievant or faculty member involved would affect their ability to render an impartial judgement shall disqualify themselves from the hearing. The Chancellor shall appoint replacements.

E. All committee members must be present to constitute a quorum.



PROCEDURES OF THE ACADEMIC GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

* Pre-Hearing Process

A. Upon receipt of an academic grievance, the Chair shall notify the faculty member involved, and the Division Chair.

B. The Chair shall call a meeting of the committee within ten working days of receipt of the grievance to review the merits of the grievance.

1) If the committee determines that the grievance is patently frivolous and unsubstantial, or if it determines that there is no identifiable or appropriate remedy, it shall dismiss the grievance, and no hearing will be held.

2) If the committee determines that the grievance is not frivolous, a hearing will be scheduled. The Chair shall set the time and date of the hearing, in consultation with the committee.

The Chair shall have the authority to waive or adjust specified time lines when necessary to ensure proper notice and a fair hearing.

C. The grievant, the faculty member, and the Division Chair shall be notified by the Chair in writing of the committee's action to dismiss or hear the grievance no later than ten working days after the committee's initial meeting, and at least ten working days prior to the hearing date.

The notice shall include the time, date, and place of the hearing; a summary of the alleged act(s) of academic impropriety; the findings of the Division Chair; and statements indicating that the hearing will be closed unless an open meeting is requested, that the burden of proof rests on the grievant, that the grievant may bring an advocate to the hearing, and that the Chancellor will make the final decision in the matter. A copy of the UHWO Academic Grievance Procedure shall also be enclosed with the notice.



* Hearing Process

A. If the grievant or the faculty member is unable to attend the hearing as scheduled for good cause and appropriate notice is provided to the Chair of the AGC, the hearing may be re-scheduled. "Good cause" will be determined by the AGC.



B. Except for good cause, if the grievant does not attend the hearing as scheduled, the hearing will be canceled, and the grievance will be dismissed and may not be re-filed.

C. Except for good cause, if the faculty member does not attend the hearing, the hearing will be held as scheduled. The committee shall render a decision based on all the information it has in its possession.

D. The hearing shall be closed, unless both the grievant and the faculty member request an open meeting. These requests must be received by the Chair of the AGC a minimum of 24 hours before the hearing.



E. The grievant and the faculty member may each have an advocate at the hearing, provided notice of the advocate's name is given to the chair at least five working days before the hearing. The advocate shall serve solely in an advisory capacity and may not actively participate in the hearing proceedings.

F. The Chair of the AGC shall be responsible for conducting the hearing, maintaining order, and recording the hearing. The chair shall have the authority to rule on points of order and to exclude immaterial and/or repetitious evidence.

G. The grievant and the faculty member shall have the opportunity to present evidence and witnesses, and to discuss the issues. Both oral and documentary evidence may be introduced.

H. The grievant and the faculty member shall have the right to question witnesses and submit rebuttal testimony.

I. Any member of the committee may raise additional questions, question witnesses, or seek clarification or information from other sources or documents not necessarily present at the hearing.



* Post-Hearing Decision-making

A. After all testimony has been received and the hearing has been completed, the committee will deliberate in a closed session to determine if the University has reasonable cause to remedy the student's academic grievance. Accordingly, the committee may decide:

1) No cause for remedy: Wrongful conduct by the faculty member has not been established.

2) Cause for remedy: Wrongful conduct by the faculty member has been established. In this case, the committee may recommend an appropriate remedy.

B. Within 10 working days after the hearing process has been completed, the Chair shall submit a written report to the Chancellor, informing the Chancellor of its findings and its recommendations.

C. Within 20 working days from receipt of the committee's written report, the Chancellor shall make a final decision regarding the grievance and send notices to the grievant and the faculty member by certified mail. Copies will be provided to the Academic Grievance Committee Chair and members, the Division Chair involved, and the Dean of Student Services.

D. The decision of the Chancellor shall be final within the University system.



RECORDS OF THE ACADEMIC GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

A. The Chair of the AGC shall maintain a log of hearings. The log shall include the date of the hearing, a brief description of the issue, and the outcome of the hearing; however, no personally identifiable information shall be noted. The log shall be considered an open record for public review.

B. All other records of the AGC shall be closed to public inspection and shall be filed in the Dean of Student Services Office.